Understand the system
How it works
Social license and lifecycle responsibility are operating requirements: communities judge visible local outcomes while hardware turnover creates a growing material afterlife.
Local decisions and the material afterlife
Select a capability to explore its role and connections.
Selected: Host community
Host community
People experiencing local jobs, taxes, land, water, power, noise, and resilience impacts.
Explore Host community in AtlasDocumented connections
- Host community → Local governance
Participation and local evidence shape conditions, legitimacy, and oversight.
Relationship evidence · 3
- [1] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- [2] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- [3] In the same Pew survey, 25 percent called data centers mostly good for local jobs and 23 percent mostly good for local tax revenue.
Selected documented dependencies. Arrows retain their Atlas direction; they do not represent quantities or a complete engineering process.
Every fab, substation, transmission line, power plant, and data center occupies a real place. Host communities weigh jobs, tax base, infrastructure, resilience, noise, land, water, emissions, and utility bills against promises that may be difficult to verify. Downstream, rapid equipment refresh creates questions of repair, resale, secure data destruction, recycling, hazardous handling, and who remains accountable after assets retire.
Social license is built locally
National enthusiasm or concern cannot substitute for local evidence and participation. Virginia's finding that one-third of data centers sit near residential areas—and that persistent low-frequency sound has affected some neighbors—shows why siting, sound modeling, enforceable limits, and accessible monitoring must be project-specific. St. Louis's 2026 Armory approval shows how that principle can become auditable conditions, including noise controls, efficiency thresholds, heat and reuse reporting, decommissioning, job floors, and specified remedies.
- Do not use national polling as a local proxy
- Publish commitments in measurable terms
Supporting evidence · 4
- [1] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- [2] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- [3] Virginia JLARC found that one-third of the state's data centers were near residential areas and that persistent low-frequency sound had affected some nearby residents even when ordinary noise limits were not exceeded.
- [4] St. Louis's April 2026 conditional approval for the Armory data-center project included closed-loop and air-cooled water design, noise and generator limits, PUE thresholds, annual heat-rejection and reuse reporting, certified e-waste handling, decommissioning, escalating 20-year job minimums, and financial or occupancy remedies for specified shortfalls.
Benefits and burdens differ
Construction work, permanent jobs, tax revenue, grid upgrades, land conversion, water use, noise, and rate impacts accrue to different groups over different time horizons. JLARC's Virginia record makes the distribution visible: most estimated economic benefit came from construction, local tax dependence varied from under one percent to thirty-one percent, and modeled residential electricity effects remained a separate exposure. Project commitments should stay separate from delivered outcomes: the St. Louis job floors and fiscal remedies are enforceable terms to monitor, not completed employment or revenue results.
- Map distribution, not only net totals
- Separate temporary and permanent employment
Supporting evidence · 8
- [1] Global investment in data centers reached roughly half a trillion U.S. dollars in 2024, nearly double the 2022 level.
- [2] LBNL estimated average U.S. data-center site water usage effectiveness at just over 0.36 liters per kWh through 2023.
- [3] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- [4] In the same Pew survey, 25 percent called data centers mostly good for local jobs and 23 percent mostly good for local tax revenue.
- [5] Virginia JLARC's modeled data-center buildout scenarios place added generation- and transmission-related cost for a typical Dominion residential customer at $14 to $37 per month in real dollars by 2040.
- [6] Virginia JLARC estimated that the state's data-center industry supports 74,000 jobs, 5.5 billion dollars in labor income, and 9.1 billion dollars in GDP annually, with most economic benefit arising during construction rather than ongoing operations.
- [7] Across five Virginia localities with relatively mature data-center markets, data-center revenue ranged from less than 1 percent to 31 percent of total local revenue.
- [8] St. Louis's April 2026 conditional approval for the Armory data-center project included closed-loop and air-cooled water design, noise and generator limits, PUE thresholds, annual heat-rejection and reuse reporting, certified e-waste handling, decommissioning, escalating 20-year job minimums, and financial or occupancy remedies for specified shortfalls.
Transparency enables accountability
Project-level reporting on electricity, water, backup generation, incentives, incidents, and milestones gives residents and policymakers a basis for evaluating promises and adapting conditions. Facility-specific utility records matter because statewide adequacy can coexist with unusually intensive sites and local allocation constraints: Prince William County's 25-building record separates average-day from maximum-day consumption and the corresponding utility-system shares.
- Report boundaries and uncertainty with every metric
- Maintain a public change log for commitments
Supporting evidence · 7
- [1] LBNL's 2025 Update places U.S. data-center electricity use at 649 TWh in its 2030 Reference Case, with compounded-uncertainty bounds of 521 to 843 TWh, or 9.5 to 15.3 percent of U.S. electricity use.
- [2] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- [3] In the same Pew survey, 25 percent called data centers mostly good for local jobs and 23 percent mostly good for local tax revenue.
- [4] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- [5] Virginia JLARC found that most data centers used no more water than an average large office building, while a few used substantially more, and recommended explicit local authority to require water-use estimates before development approval.
- [6] Prince William County reported that Service Authority records for 25 operating data-center buildings showed about 18,000 gallons per building on an average day and about 88,000 gallons on a maximum day; together, the buildings represented about 1.5 percent of system average-day demand and 3.9 percent of maximum-day demand.
- [7] St. Louis's April 2026 conditional approval for the Armory data-center project included closed-loop and air-cooled water design, noise and generator limits, PUE thresholds, annual heat-rejection and reuse reporting, certified e-waste handling, decommissioning, escalating 20-year job minimums, and financial or occupancy remedies for specified shortfalls.
Design for the second life
Modularity, repair, component harvesting, resale, secure erasure, take-back, and responsible recycling can retain value and reduce waste before material recovery becomes the final option. EPA's federal equipment hierarchy makes reuse and redeployment the preferred path for functional electronics rather than treating recycling as the first destination.
- Prioritize reuse before shredding
- Track exported and informal waste flows
Supporting evidence · 3
- [1] U.S. EPA guidance places reuse and redeployment of functional electronics ahead of recycling, with refurbishment, repair, component harvesting, and secure data handling used to retain equipment value where practicable.
- [2] The world generated 62 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2022, while 22.3 percent was documented as formally collected and recycled.
- [3] UNITAR projects global electronic waste to reach 82 million tonnes in 2030 under current trends.
Featured evidence
Evidence in context
Global e-waste estimate and modeled trajectory
The 2022 point is an estimate for all electronic waste; the 2030 point is a projection under the monitor's modeled trajectory. Neither value measures AI infrastructure or data-center retirements specifically.View chart values
| Category | Global e-waste |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 62 Mt Million tonnes |
| 2030 | 82 Mt Million tonnes |
Key indicators
Key measures & constraints
- 01
In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- Class
- estimate
- Geography
- United States
- Period
- January 20–26, 2026 survey
- Confidence
- high
- 02
Virginia JLARC estimated that the state's data-center industry supports 74,000 jobs, 5.5 billion dollars in labor income, and 9.1 billion dollars in GDP annually, with most economic benefit arising during construction rather than ongoing operations.
- Class
- estimate
- Geography
- Virginia, United States
- Period
- 2024 legislative evaluation
- Confidence
- high
- 03
Virginia JLARC's modeled data-center buildout scenarios place added generation- and transmission-related cost for a typical Dominion residential customer at $14 to $37 per month in real dollars by 2040.
- Class
- projection
- Geography
- Virginia, United States
- Period
- 2040 modeled scenarios
- Confidence
- medium
- 04
Virginia JLARC found that one-third of the state's data centers were near residential areas and that persistent low-frequency sound had affected some nearby residents even when ordinary noise limits were not exceeded.
- Class
- estimate
- Geography
- Virginia, United States
- Period
- 2024 legislative evaluation
- Confidence
- high
- 05
The world generated 62 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2022, while 22.3 percent was documented as formally collected and recycled.
- Class
- estimate
- Geography
- Global
- Period
- 2022
- Confidence
- high
System map
Connections across the system
Explore inputs, outputs, and shared capabilities in the Atlas. Open the register for every documented relationship.
Enters this system 4
- AI rack system→ Hardware lifecycleTrace relationship
- Environmental permitting→ Local governanceTrace relationship
Leaves this system 7
- Data-center campus← Local governanceTrace relationship
- Liquid cooling← Water systemTrace relationship
Shared capabilities can belong to more than one System. These links carry materials, energy, information, capital, or permissions; they describe dependencies, not quantities or a complete process model.
Explore 9 capabilities and operating boundaries
All documented relationships · 16
- criticaloutput
Land, water, fiscal, and construction decisions condition campus development.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 4
- [1] LBNL estimated average U.S. data-center site water usage effectiveness at just over 0.36 liters per kWh through 2023.
- [2] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- [3] CRS finds that individual data centers typically fall under state and local siting, while the federal permitting nexus varies by project; FERC, NRC, the Army Corps, and delegated air and water programs may apply depending on configuration and location.
- [4] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- importantoutput
Water availability and cooling architecture shape heat-rejection options.
Trace relationship - importantinternal
Participation and local evidence shape conditions, legitimacy, and oversight.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 3
- [1] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- [2] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- [3] In the same Pew survey, 25 percent called data centers mostly good for local jobs and 23 percent mostly good for local tax revenue.
- importantoutput
Specialized engineering and technician capability enables ramp and operations.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- importantoutput
Skilled trades, commissioning, controls, and operations turn assets into capacity.
Trace relationship - importantinput
Refresh and retirement send systems into reuse, parts recovery, or recycling.
Trace relationship - importantinput
Environmental permitting supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 3
- [1] CRS finds that individual data centers typically fall under state and local siting, while the federal permitting nexus varies by project; FERC, NRC, the Army Corps, and delegated air and water programs may apply depending on configuration and location.
- [2] A July 2025 U.S. executive order directs agencies to review categorical exclusions, use FAST-41 processes where eligible, support brownfield guidance, and examine federal sites for data-center infrastructure; those mechanisms do not themselves constitute project approval.
- [3] EPA's January 2026 redevelopment guidance says candidate data-center sites must fit site conditions, reach power and fiber, comply with applicable regulation and cleanup controls, and incorporate planning and community input.
- importantinput
Grid regulation supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 3
- [1] FERC Order No. 2023 requires cluster studies, greater project-readiness requirements, and transmission-provider delay penalties for generator interconnection.
- [2] On June 18, 2026, FERC opened targeted proceedings for six RTOs and ISOs to justify or reform large-load interconnection practices, including flexible service, cost-allocation, and co-location questions.
- [3] FERC's chair stated on June 18, 2026 that compliance with Order No. 2023 was not yet fully complete across transmission providers.
- importantinternal
Ratepayer impacts supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- [1] Virginia JLARC's modeled data-center buildout scenarios place added generation- and transmission-related cost for a typical Dominion residential customer at $14 to $37 per month in real dollars by 2040.
- [2] In Pew's 2026 U.S. data-center survey, 39 percent called data centers mostly bad for the environment, 38 percent mostly bad for home energy costs, and 30 percent mostly bad for nearby quality of life.
- importantinternal
Jobs & tax outcomes supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 3
- [1] Virginia JLARC estimated that the state's data-center industry supports 74,000 jobs, 5.5 billion dollars in labor income, and 9.1 billion dollars in GDP annually, with most economic benefit arising during construction rather than ongoing operations.
- [2] Across five Virginia localities with relatively mature data-center markets, data-center revenue ranged from less than 1 percent to 31 percent of total local revenue.
- [3] In the same Pew survey, 25 percent called data centers mostly good for local jobs and 23 percent mostly good for local tax revenue.
- importantinternal
Benefit agreements & commitments supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- [1] St. Louis's April 2026 conditional approval for the Armory data-center project included closed-loop and air-cooled water design, noise and generator limits, PUE thresholds, annual heat-rejection and reuse reporting, certified e-waste handling, decommissioning, escalating 20-year job minimums, and financial or occupancy remedies for specified shortfalls.
- [2] Virginia JLARC found that most data centers used no more water than an average large office building, while a few used substantially more, and recommended explicit local authority to require water-use estimates before development approval.
- importantinternal
Repair, reuse & recycling supplies a distinct operating capability within its broader Atlas system.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 3
- [1] U.S. EPA guidance places reuse and redeployment of functional electronics ahead of recycling, with refurbishment, repair, component harvesting, and secure data handling used to retain equipment value where practicable.
- [2] The world generated 62 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2022, while 22.3 percent was documented as formally collected and recycled.
- [3] UNITAR projects global electronic waste to reach 82 million tonnes in 2030 under current trends.
- importantinput
Tariff and cost-allocation choices determine how infrastructure costs reach other customers.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- [1] On June 18, 2026, FERC opened targeted proceedings for six RTOs and ISOs to justify or reform large-load interconnection practices, including flexible service, cost-allocation, and co-location questions.
- [2] Virginia JLARC's modeled data-center buildout scenarios place added generation- and transmission-related cost for a typical Dominion residential customer at $14 to $37 per month in real dollars by 2040.
- importantoutput
Enforceable commitments can become conditions of site approval and continuing operation.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- [1] St. Louis's April 2026 conditional approval for the Armory data-center project included closed-loop and air-cooled water design, noise and generator limits, PUE thresholds, annual heat-rejection and reuse reporting, certified e-waste handling, decommissioning, escalating 20-year job minimums, and financial or occupancy remedies for specified shortfalls.
- [2] Virginia JLARC found that most data centers used no more water than an average large office building, while a few used substantially more, and recommended explicit local authority to require water-use estimates before development approval.
- enablingoutput
Recovery can return selected metals to material supply and reduce virgin demand.
Trace relationship - enablingoutput
Reuse, parts harvesting, and recycling can reduce virgin demand and return selected materials to supply.
Trace relationshipSupporting evidence · 2
- [1] U.S. EPA guidance places reuse and redeployment of functional electronics ahead of recycling, with refurbishment, repair, component harvesting, and secure data handling used to retain equipment value where practicable.
- [2] The world generated 62 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2022, while 22.3 percent was documented as formally collected and recycled.
Named companies + institutions
Organizations & their roles
- material · regulator
U.S. EPA
United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. environmental regulator publishing siting, brownfield, and electronics-reuse guidance relevant to infrastructure lifecycle decisions.
Roles, locations & evidence
- Role
- regulator
- Products / service
- electronics reuse hierarchy guidance
- Documented activity
- United States
- Headquarters
- United States
Why this organization belongs in the System- Repair, reuse & recycling
Primary-source evidence connects this institution to electronics reuse hierarchy guidance in the specified Atlas capability.
- material · research institution
UNITAR
United Nations Institute for Training and ResearchUnited Nations institute publishing the Global E-waste Monitor with international partners.
Roles, locations & evidence
- Role
- community party
- Products / service
- global electronics-lifecycle evidence
- Documented activity
- World
- Headquarters
- Not cataloged
Why this organization belongs in the System- Hardware lifecycle
Primary-source evidence connects this institution to global electronics-lifecycle evidence in the specified Atlas capability.
Affected policies
Relevant policies
Legal status is separated from policy objective. Every record keeps its jurisdiction, mechanism, affected nodes, and verification date.
- effective
U.S. CHIPS and Science Act incentives
Expand domestic semiconductor manufacturing, research, workforce, and supply-chain resilience.
Mechanism, scope & sources
Manufacturing grants, loans and guarantees, research programs, and an investment tax credit with program conditions; current project records distinguish proposed and final awards, with disbursement tied to milestones.
United StatesOpen full policy record - effective
European Chips Act
Strengthen European semiconductor capacity, research leadership, monitoring, and crisis response.
Mechanism, scope & sources
Coordinates the Chips for Europe initiative, first-of-a-kind facility support, supply monitoring, and crisis tools; the Commission's Chips Act 2.0 work remains a proposal rather than replacement law.
European UnionOpen full policy record
Read this System in the field guide
Continue in the Volumes
Start with three selected readings, or explore the complete reading list.
Complete reading list
Matter
1 spreadsPermission
3 spreadsEvidence & review
currentEvidence health26 active claims · next review Oct 13, 2026+
- Active claims
- 26
- Sources
- 19
- High volatility
- 11
- Next review
- Oct 13, 2026
- Due soon
- 0
- Overdue
- 0
- Superseded
- 0